WHO REPRESENTS YOUR COMMUNITY?

WHO REPRESENTS YOUR COMMUNITY?

In the first edition of the Hawkesbury Highlands Bilpin RFS President claimed that along with Bilpin Regional Action Group (BRAG) and the Bilpin Hall Committee, organizations which work closely together, their views represent ten percent of the population.

So, what about the other ninety percent of the population of Bilpin, who represents’ their views or the positions of other communities in the Hawkesbury Highlands on varying issues? Who should our politicians, Council and local bureaucrats consult with on matters concerning our communities?

Determining who speaks for a community is a complex and sensitive issue, and there are always multiple groups claiming to represent the same community, each with different perspectives and priorities. Here are some factors to consider when deciding who speaks for the most people:

How many people are members of the group? Are they representative of the community they claim to represent, or do they only represent a particular subset of that community?

Does the group have a legitimate claim to speak for the community? Have they been elected or appointed by the community, or do they have a history of working on behalf of the community?

Does the group represent a broad cross-section of the community, or does it only represent a particular subset? Do they consider the views and concerns of different groups within the community?

What has the group done in the past to benefit the community? Have they delivered tangible benefits, or have they been ineffective or even harmful?

Is there a broad consensus within the community that this group speaks for them? Are there other groups that also claim to speak for the community, and if so, why do they feel that the other group does not represent their views.

Ultimately the decision of who speaks for the most people is a complex and ongoing process, and it may change over time as the needs and priorities of the community evolve.

It’s important to listen to different perspectives and engage in dialogue with a range of stakeholders to ensure that all voices are heard and that decisions are made in the best interests of the whole community.

This content was generated by Chat GPT

HAWKESBURY COUNCIL FLIES IN VICTORIAN EXPERT TO TALK TO BILPIN BUSHFIRE VICTIMS

HAWKESBURY COUNCIL FLIES IN VICTORIAN EXPERT TO TALK TO BILPIN BUSHFIRE VICTIMS

Hawkesbury Council Community Recovery Co-ordinator Liz Murphy organised a community dinner for bushfire survivors at Chapel Hill Berambing and flew in Victorian disaster expert Dr Rob Gordon to speak at the event. 38 people attended the event of which about 30 were residents impacted by the fires.

Dr Gordon spoke after dinner and repeated the information contained in videos made by the Victorian Government after the 2009 Black Saturday fires featuring him discussing the road to recovery which covers the following topics:

  • Coping with stress after an emergency
  • Building trust and confidence in your community post emergency
  • Tackling uncertainty and anxiety ahead of the next fire season
  • Summer strategies to manage feelings and reduce stress.
  • Accepting the risk of bushfire and creating a new future
  • Learning to trust your own thinking and action.

 You can view these videos at  https://services.dffh.vic.gov.au/travelling-road-recovery-video-series

Some comments from people who attended the dinner.

 He is a boring speaker, but his videos are good.

The food was great, and it was the first-time government bushfire money has been spent in Berambing, and on a deserving business that was burnout by the fires.

It must have cost a bomb. It was nice to have a free meal and chat with neighbours, but I don’t think it was a good use of bushfire money.

People need to feel safe and to do this we have to talk about what happened. The RFS need to give a proper apology for their backburn and failure to warn us of the unfolding emergency. Then we need to talk about what can be done to make sure the same mistakes aren’t repeated. After this we will feel safe and be able to renew our trust and confidence in the RFS and NSW Government. 

The meeting ran over time so not all attendee questions got answered. Council Recovery Co-ordinator Liz Murphy video Dr Gordon addressing the remaining questions after he returned to Victoria. You can view this at https://hawkesbury.sharefile.com/d-se244b6b3f184436aa4f583ef6c0c6adc

VOICE TO PARLIAMENT – a statement from the Highlands

VOICE TO PARLIAMENT – a statement from the Highlands

People driving on BLOR past Bilpin Cider will catch a view of the Aboriginal flag flying next to the Australian flag at the entrance to the Cellar Door.

This is the first business to fly the First Nation people’s flag in the Highlands and it has sparked discussion about the upcoming Voice to Parliament referendum everyone will be lining up to vote on in a few months’ time.

 What’s the Voice about?

In 2017 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Nations gathered at Uluru and made a statement from the heart of Australia. Part of this statement was seeking constitutional reform:

“We seek constitutional reforms to empower our people and take a rightful place in our own country. When we have power over our destiny our children will flourish. They will walk in two worlds and their culture will be a gift to their country. We call for the establishment of a First Nations Voice enshrined in the Constitution.” (Uluru Statement for the Heart 2017)

Embedding a Voice in the Constitution would recognise the special place of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia’s history, but importantly would also mean that it can’t be shut down by successive Governments. This is important because Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and bodies have called for a voice for close to 100 years. (Reconciliation Australia.org.au)

Is a Voice needed?

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders are the only racial group in Australia who have policies and laws made specifically for them, and government ministers and departments that specialise in implementing these laws and policy which often have an adverse impact on their lives.

A Voice to Parliament will give Indigenous communities a route to help inform policy and legal decisions that impact their lives. It will provide a mechanism where First Nation people can directly voice their concerns and ideas to Parliament regardless of who is Prime Minister and what ideas are fashionable at any time, and they believe this will give them greater control of their lives.

Opposing the Voice is the Liberal/National Party who proposed to pass laws establishing local and regional bodies to act as the Voice. Some First Nation leaders also oppose the Voice believing it will create another layer of bureaucracy and not solve any of the dire health and social problems racking their communities.

What is the referendum question?

“A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice.

Do you approve this proposed alteration?”

If the majority of people in the majority of the States of Australia vote yes, then Parliament will make laws creating the Voice. When governments change these laws can be changed but the Voice cannot be extinguished without a referendum to remove it from the Constitution.

https://voice.gov.au/referendum-2023/referendum-question-and-constitutional-amendment?

 

BUSHFIRE RECOVERY, SPIRIT AND STRENGTH

BUSHFIRE RECOVERY, SPIRIT AND STRENGTH

I could quote the statistics – 18,600,000 hectares burned, 5,900 buildings destroyed, 34 lives lost, 1,000,000,000 animals killed. I could tell you about better building practices – strengthened BAL40 guidelines, a revised National Construction Code, new and improved fire attenuation materials.

Article Source The Australian Institute of Architects June 2021

No access to further information for bushfire victims

No access to further information for bushfire victims

Residents whose homes were burnt when a backburn lit by the Rural Fire Service at Mt Wilson got out of control have failed in a bid for more details on an internal report into the incident.

The Mt Wilson RFS Backburn Survivors Group sought information on the report before the resumption of the coronial inquiry into the NSW 2019-20 bushfires on May 16.

The group is being represented pro bono by barrister, former NSW Upper House MP and former Blue Mountains mayor, Adam Searle, Mt Wilson.

A survivors group spokesman, Jochen Spencer, said in preparation for the upcoming hearing, they wrote to the RFS Commissioner seeking 314 references that are missing from an investigation report.

He said the group could not test the report’s findings without the reference material relied on to formulate them. “It is normal practice for a government department to reference sources relied on to make statements of fact, but this has not been done,” Mr Spencer said. “We requested the 314 references missing from the RFS on February 1… Finally they said, through a directions hearing at the coroners court, they are not going to provide the information and the report.

He said the references would help the group “get a better picture of what the plan was and how it was carried out”.”It is really disappointing to have a government department be have like this.”

An RFS spokesman said the organisation had produced “a vast amount of documents required of it by the state coroner and is willing to produce further specific documents if required by the coroner”.

Article Source Blue Mountains Gazette April 29 2023

WHAT’S THIS SIGN ALL ABOUT?

WHAT’S THIS SIGN ALL ABOUT?

Drivers along Bells Line of Road can’t miss it. East Bilpin resident Martin Tebbutt a 50-year Bilpin property owner erected it after becoming angry at the removal of street trees he planted and had nurtured for the past two years. The Tebbutt property, along with many other residents in East Bilpin & Kurrajong Heights were burnout by the out-of-control RFS Mt Wilson backburn.

“Many trees along Bells Line Road were killed by the fire and when they were removed the place looked terrible. Much of the district has beautiful roadside trees planted by previous generations and so my wife and I planted decorative trees each side of the road for future generations to admire.” Said Martin Tebbutt.

The Tebbutt’s nurtured the trees for 2 years receiving compliments from neighbors and residents for their efforts.

The trouble started when the Tebbutts received a phone call from the President of the Bilpin RFS Brigade stating a fire trail was going to be made through the plantings on one side of the road and the trees had to be removed as they were a danger to the community.

“I email my response and said there was space for a fire trail beside the plantings and suggested we discuss things. In the past I have had a good relationship with our local RFS who I had found to be respectful and friendly. But I couldn’t find common ground with this Brigade Executive,” said Tebbutt. Bilpin Brigade did not answer this email.

Next the Tebbutt’s received a visit from NSW RFS officials responding to a complaint that their property was a fire hazard. “I was shocked when they turned up. They wouldn’t say who made the complaint.  I showed them around, they were decent people and very professional and the complimented me on how well kept my property is,” said Tebbutt.

The RFS Commissioner Rob Rogers then sent Mr. Tebbutt a letter saying that his property was not a fire hazard.

Next the Tebbutts received two anonymous abusive letters in their mailbox and one abusive phone call anonymous persons saying they hated the street trees and they needed to be removed.

So, the Tebbutts asked NSW RFS whether they were concerned about their street trees and received their second supportive letter from the RFS Commissioner Rob Rogers saying they weren’t.

Then Hawkesbury Council stepped in after receiving a complaint about the street tree planting from the Bilpin RFS Brigade President. This complaint fell on more fertile ground than the NSW RFS. The Council Administration concluded they had the legal power to remove the trees as the Tebbutt’s had not sought Council permission to plant them. The cost to ratepayers for removal of the trees was $4,602.02.  

The Bilpin RFS posted information on their Facebook page making claims, Tebbutt stated, were false and misleading about the street plantings, however he was unable to respond as the comment’s icon had been disabled.

“This was the last straw. I put up my sign to let everyone know what I think about the behavior of Bilpin RFS and Council”

According to Tebbutt the sign is staying up until Bilpin RFS remove the false statements, they have made on their Facebook Page about the street trees and apologize.